Mon
2
admin

if wwe and tna decides to pull all the storylines, entrance music
no more heels,babyfaces
no more pyros, no backstage acts
just 2 hrs of plain shoot matches, much like roh or amatuer wrestling
would u still watch or u would u prefer watching the way it is
dont say ufc cuz its completely different genre of sport

Wrestling is a male's version of a soap opera. Drama and stuff like that makes it more interesting, which is why i don't watch UFC. Even if it is predictible, sometimes poorly executed, and in some ways "fake", id way rather watch it the way it is than what your saying!

Author:
admin

7 Responses to “would u still watch?”

  1. book of wrestling Says:

    Then you have UFC
    References :
    Learn Your Wrestling History

  2. The Cisco Kid Says:

    Wrestling is a male's version of a soap opera. Drama and stuff like that makes it more interesting, which is why i don't watch UFC. Even if it is predictible, sometimes poorly executed, and in some ways "fake", id way rather watch it the way it is than what your saying!
    References :

  3. anr_0000 Says:

    as long as i can se edge, benoit, batista, hbk, and the others it is just the same as if it had it.
    References :

  4. goodfella Says:

    damn straight i would plus commercial free and vince vs jarrett loser must go out of business match no outside interfereance.
    References :

  5. Hornswoggle PAB PAC (prev. RKO!) Says:

    Yep, it means no Cena and FAGtista cause they cant wrestle - it would be a 10 man roster…
    Orton, Edge, Benoit, Shelton, Haas, Kennedy, HBK, HHH, Taker and Kane
    References :

  6. Nicole S Says:

    I would prefer to have it how it is right now.
    References :

  7. raptor26@sbcglobal.net Says:

    No. Wrestling would SUCK.
    References :

      Leave a Reply